Gitlab youtrack integration
- GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION HOW TO
- GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION CODE
- GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION SERIES
To configure YouTrack’s Defect URLs in TestRail, select Administration > Integration. If you see the Add link, you can copy the ID of your new YouTrack issue and enter it into any Defects or References field inside TestRail. This link allows you to jump to YouTrack’s New Issue form to report a new bug. Once the URL is configured, a new Add link appears next to the Defects field in the Add Test Result dialog and the ‘Defects’ menu in TestRail’s Defect From Anywhere feature. The Defect Add URL is used to create a link to the issue creation screen inside YouTrack. The Defect View URL is used to build a link to YouTrack based on the Defect ID, so you can simply click on an ID to open the issue directly in YouTrack. There are two types of URLs: View URLs and Add URLs.
GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION HOW TO
If anyone has any advice or pointers, I’m all ears.The defect URLs are used to let TestRail know how to convert a Defect ID into a URL for your YouTrack instance. In essence, I’m looking for advice on how to organize a GitLab instance. Do they all get lumped together in this model?
GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION CODE
Still, they write their integrations as Apache Camel / java code that runs in Openshift containers, so they kind of count as microservices / miniature systems. Following off of the above (which should probably be its own topic), does anyone have any advice for how to handle integrations between systems, in terms of where its code should go? Currently, our integrations dedicated team puts their code under their team, but that doesn’t necessarily link to the systems on either side.I’m estimating that we have around 200+ distinct systems here on campus, from network infrastructure to departmental applications and everything in between. Then our teams would get their own groups, and have the systems assigned to the team groups. I’ve been thinking of switching to a model where “systems” get their own top-level groups, and then projects/subgroups under that handle individual repos/configs/automation scripts / so on. Currently we have our team groups, and then projects under those. In my mind, I’m thinking that we need to re-organize our internal GitLab Groups.
![gitlab youtrack integration gitlab youtrack integration](https://www.developpez.com/public/images/news/yt202101-01gitlab-fr-fr.png)
It also looks like anyone with reporter status can add/remove them, unless there’s some way to secure them or make them mandatory that I’m missing. Looking at GitLab, it seems as if scoped labels will follow that path… but they need to be set on the group/project level and are not global.
GITLAB YOUTRACK INTEGRATION SERIES
![gitlab youtrack integration gitlab youtrack integration](https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/8215/96517/icon/pluginIcon.png)
My organization is looking at adjusting how we conduct business, and incorporating tools better.